Skip to content

What Is x401? Identity Proof for Agentic Commerce

Draft HTTP identity-proof requirements for agentic commerce: credential verification, issuer trust and the boundary with x402 payments.

0selected itemsRelated topicsAgent EconomyFraud & Risk

Reviewed protocol reference

x401 is a draft HTTP protocol for requesting credential-based proof before granting access to a protected resource. Its version 0.1.0 specification separates proof handling from payment: the service sets evidence requirements, an agent obtains a wallet presentation, and the verifier evaluates the proof. The verifier decides which issuers it trusts. Proof's October 15, 2026 announcement describes production wallet and agent capabilities; it does not turn the draft into a mandatory payment-network standard.

Protocol timeline

  1. Proof announces production agent identity-wallet capabilities. The company says initial protocol publication was in June 2026; an exact June date has not been independently verified. Source

  2. Editorial review confirms version 0.1.0 is marked Draft. This is a review date, not a protocol release date. Source

Frequently asked questions

What is x401?
A draft HTTP protocol for requesting credential-based proof before access to a protected resource or action is granted. The reviewed specification is version 0.1.0.
How is x401 different from x402?
x401 handles proof requirements. Payment, when required, uses HTTP 402 and a separate payment protocol such as x402. x401 does not itself move or settle money.
Was x401 first published in October 2026?
No. Proof says it first published x401 in June 2026. Its October 15 announcement describes production capabilities; the specification remains a draft.
What should implementers check?
Check accepted issuers and credentials, challenge binding and replay protection, the scope of authorized actions, and disclosure and retention policies. A successful proof exchange does not by itself establish regulatory compliance or replace payment authorization.
How should compatibility claims be assessed?
Verify the specific implementation and version with both providers. Protocol documentation alone does not establish compatibility, certification or a partnership.

Further reading

Regulatory references are background reading, not evidence of a provider’s licences. No integration, compatibility or certification is implied.

Latest selected

No selected items for this topic yet